|
1
|
- Goods Movement Strategies
- Shippers Perspective
|
|
2
|
- Inconsistency in moving product
- Increased costs to move product
- No clear direction or vision for the future
- Lack of infrastructure to meet growing demand
|
|
3
|
- Shifts in global sourcing
- Diversification of Ports by shippers
- - Delays in product movement
- - Escalating costs
- - Legislative actions
- Increase in vessel size increasing congestion
- More transload business closer to ports
|
|
4
|
- Railroad Infrastructure
- Ports/Terminals Fees
- Gasoline Taxes
- Ocean Freight
|
|
5
|
- Pier Pass
- - Collaborative, industry led
process
- - Fee based with definable
benefits
- - Paradigm shift in freight
movement
- Reducing free time at the ports
- Industry education/advocacy
|
|
6
|
- Engage shippers in solving the issues
- Policy development should be a collaborative effort
- Enlist support from Federal Government,
specifically MTSNAC and MARAD
|
|
7
|
- Develop a “Blue Ribbon” panel
- - Objective: Develop a
comprehensive
- Transportation Policy
- - Involve all stakeholders
- - Driven by Secretary Mineta in
collaboration
- with Governor and
legislative leaders
- - Engage shippers to promote
policy
|
|
8
|
- Develop a narrow list of projects that have far reaching impacts for
goods movement:
- - I-710 expansion (10 lanes)
- - Add third set of rail tracks
to Cajon Pass
- - Colton Rail Separation
- - Replace Gerald Desmond Bridge
- - State Route 47 expressway
- - Bay Area bridge replacement
- - Support for near dock
facility for BNSF
- - Incentive program to get
older trucks off road
|
|
9
|
|